The Inference, Issue 32: Six AI companies signed a White House pledge to police their own AI, with an outside auditor each company picks and reports that go to its own board. Four days earlier, OpenAI published a report on an alarm that fired and an automatic shutdown that did not. Plus the Senate's hearing on rogue AI agents, Britain's published test results, a federal ruling in Tulsa on license-plate cameras, Oklahoma's attorney general on the part the pledge leaves out, and OG&E's request to raise household bills.
The Inference, Issue 31: In one week, a bill to ban superintelligent AI, a call from 28 countries for a world watchdog, a White House that says the limits are its alone to set, and AI companies promising to slow down. Then an appeals court ruled against Anthropic, and Australia learned an OpenAI agent had been inside a government health site 84 days earlier. Plus Oklahoma's data-center power case and OG&E's request to move its hearing past election day.
The Inference, Issue 30: Anthropic's chief executive published a plan to slow the whole industry down and seat outside evaluators inside the company. The President answered that the only guardrail AI needs is him, and called the danger a hoax. The House adjourned without a vote. Three claimants to one decision, and only one left a record anyone can read; meanwhile a Florida school board wrote the week's one finished rule.
The Inference, Issue 29: Anthropic's alignment science lead said in public that his company has no plan to control a superintelligent AI. Three days later its chief executive proposed slowing the whole industry down and seating outside reviewers inside the company. A US firm used AI to build a worm that could reach a billion phones and told the app's maker, not any US agency. And Oklahoma settled its Google power contract during a recess, on a sealed file.
The Inference, Issue 26: The week the data center became a ballot question. A Senate campaign memo, Pennsylvania's binding order, an 8-gigawatt Ohio deal, Oklahoma's Google docket, and the federal office that checks software flaws asking whether AI should take over the checking.
The Inference, Issue 21: the week Oklahoma's priced gate got a public calendar. The Corporation Commission has reportedly set November 3 as the decision date for the first tariff under the new data-center law, the same day voters decide whether the law's own author joins the Commission. New York, the same morning this issue's gather ran, imposed the nation's first statewide data-center moratorium by executive order rather than by signing its own legislature's bill. Pittsburg County's tabled incentives for a fifty-billion-dollar campus stay parked until the developer answers its neighbors. The gate is real, it now has a date, and the people deciding it are on the ballot.
The Inference, Issue 20: the week Oklahoma's ratepayer-protection posture produced a real win (a 15 percent power-rate ask negotiated down to about 1 percent for households) while the state's new priced-gate law took effect and awaited its first tariff test, the federal grid regulator forced six regional operators to justify how they connect large loads, other states split between banning data centers and pulling their subsidies, and the AI demand driving all of it cleared to open wider with GPT-5.6's public release. Oklahoma's bet is the priced gate: not a ban, but a bill sent to the load that caused the cost. The first numbers show both that the posture is working and where the household still pays first.
